Re: [sidr] WG LC for draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-06.txt

Warren Kumari <> Fri, 05 August 2011 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4E521F8C1E for <>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.357
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pMZNWemJDbBR for <>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F1B21F8C1B for <>; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 07:56:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E4521B416C6; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 10:56:36 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Warren Kumari <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:56:33 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <>
To: Sandra Murphy <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: sidr wg list <>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG LC for draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-06.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 14:56:19 -0000


On Jul 13, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:

> The chairs have received a request from the authors for a WG Last Call for "The RPKI Ghostbusters Record", draft-ietf-sidr-ghostbusters-06.
> The document and the draft version history are available at:
> The Last Call will end Wed, 3 Aug 2011 (AOE).  This is three weeks instead of the usual two, because the IETF week will occupy people's time and attention.

Yes, the IETF week did indeed occupy my (notoriously fickle) attention and I completely forgot to weigh in before the official cutoff. 

> As usual, please address all comments to the WG mailing list, and please be clear in your comments to this last call if you are supporting the document's submission to the IESG or if you are opposed. If you are opposed, please indicate why.

I am "supporting the document's submission to the IESG" -- I have read the draft, and it addresses and obvious need. 

Personally I would have thrown a bunch more stuff in the record, but then it would have ended up bloated and unusable, so I support it how it is...


> --Sandy, speaking as wg chair, with wg chair snood on

Oooh, picture please?.... I lost my snood in the canal and have been looking for a replacement, preferably one with polka dots, a miniature short-wave radio, and a packet suitable for storing butter paddles, but it's really hard to find a good one these days...

> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list