Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Mon, 14 November 2011 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB13611E81BA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B43enHMxWiRw for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7045A11E80BE for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so8883508iae.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sxekXY2LRzjWJguWbR9uzp67xDPAMWko7iEilhU/RDk=; b=QCz6FzDQPPZkgkL3nOu4M/Gc/iZ1EnwDOiyUyU2M4sZ8dfSp6XBflQfH7QOo71ovfb Nzx/wX7dwF2KFizXVGXYs6XfVIsyAxqh25B616MJnqvPmfSHeYHYhxeoaimwnaY2b9xx cyFpHdc1dWUUQZLMTkfWIdlBWysxe5++HOn1c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.68.20 with SMTP id t20mr5013739ibi.18.1321252142149; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.202.142 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:29:02 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2D5C11B3-B33E-4215-B15C-C10B0D581C57@tcb.net>
References: <CAL9jLaaOm_=W85r3P990A6DtROTcQwSJ-KBRzAi9ugw1Bo1_cQ@mail.gmail.com> <E4B4DE52-BBB3-4FA0-A75A-B51824BA83E7@lacnic.net> <m2hb3a7uqp.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2fwiu7uji.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLabcaLnBbZXbNf7Lbv+ppm-h9yO+wBHunG4s1=emOyM6=w@mail.gmail.com> <805B0799-7026-4532-A53C-4CFE3E863A33@castlepoint.net> <m2hb2q4uhj.wl%randy@psg.com> <6054A2B1-40D3-49E6-8972-946D426E830B@castlepoint.net> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD4656937791451629610@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <CAL9jLaZ2LYj4J0kzHd0p3a0RGtuPZ+7PiGVPQe2pzquEstchwg@mail.gmail.com> <2D5C11B3-B33E-4215-B15C-C10B0D581C57@tcb.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 01:29:02 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: uNZhhhnXMVIdoGB1T5WIPIm9-zc
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaYDs1X8kM-XMr5-x7w6qJMs2N-vUGJWr1q9gY3BrDN27Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:29:03 -0000

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> wrote:
>
> On Nov 13, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> I suspect some feedback to Danny will come soonish, but can we close
>> out the other set of requests?
>
> Chris,
> I'm not sure I understand the request, can you clarify?

can try :)

> I.e., until I've had adequate time to review updated I-Ds with changes
> incorporated in context it's hard to determine if we can close on those
> issues.
>

there were a slew of changes (or a slew of comments made) requested, a
document update happened ~13 days ago, did the changes account for the
comments/requests or not?

The outstanding (today) new request I get won't be dealt with yet, but
it seems from the  conversation between you/randy that it's moving in
the right direction, no?

-chris

> -danny
>