Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: (with COMMENT)

Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF99B1296F5; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:19:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3wwWyBrVHr3Q; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from adrilankha.hactrn.net (adrilankha.hactrn.net [147.28.0.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95C331296EA; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (c-73-47-197-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.47.197.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nargothrond.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (not verified)) by adrilankha.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BDEEB869; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:19:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minas-ithil.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85CD4664FD9; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:19:00 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:19:00 -0500
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <148457339142.22536.12377935833892537902.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148457339142.22536.12377935833892537902.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20170131001900.A85CD4664FD9@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Guj6FnRbzqFmSxPpKWlv-kGgRgM>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-publication@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:19:39 -0000

At Mon, 16 Jan 2017 05:29:51 -0800, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote:
...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> My only question is why this is a sidr wg doc? This seems like a general
> mechanism that cannot only be used in the routing infrastructure. Has
> this doc been at least reviewed by other wgs?

It was written to solve a specific problem in in the RPKI protocol
suite (it was actually written outside of the IETF, but was brought
into the SIDR WG a long time ago).  It's been around for years.  No
idea if anybody outside the SIDR WG read it before IETF Last Call.

With respect, I don't think this constitutes grounds for delaying this
document.  Since you made this a COMMENT rather than a DISCUSS I will
assume you agree unless you tell me otherwise. :)