IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying-05.txt

Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com> Tue, 20 May 2014 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <TurnerS@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652171A0449 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 06:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc7g0yJcW379 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 May 2014 06:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway05.websitewelcome.com (gateway05.websitewelcome.com [69.56.148.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7801A0336 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 06:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway05.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id E6C6A6E6E310B; Tue, 20 May 2014 08:41:26 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator3286.hostgator.com (gator3286.hostgator.com [198.57.247.250]) by gateway05.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56A06E6E1B3B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 08:41:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [198.180.150.142] (port=49465 helo=v142.vpn.iad.rg.net) by gator3286.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <TurnerS@ieca.com>) id 1WmkIC-0004hj-4y for sidr@ietf.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 08:41:20 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
From: Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <m28uq5zlzo.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 09:41:17 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C2542AFC-2EB9-46F8-B371-533C4E20BC6B@ieca.com>
References: <20140429141007.21954.23015.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <99F6C803-C724-430F-AF95-461CBE778C05@ieca.com> <CF86D3BA.1A323%wesley.george@twcable.com> <25567F3D-6C59-48D2-B99F-A88F402D3058@ieca.com> <CF97BB69.1B86D%wesley.george@twcable.com> <m28uq5zlzo.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator3286.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 198.180.150.142
X-Exim-ID: 1WmkIC-0004hj-4y
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (v142.vpn.iad.rg.net) [198.180.150.142]:49465
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IzMjg2Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/H2WMvYCBbvBLl9_pWrSu4VGFiSI
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying-05.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 13:41:28 -0000

On May 13, 2014, at 12:23, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> Though I’m not sure that there is a huge distinction between disabling
>> BGPSec and taking the router offline since disabling BGPSec would trigger
>> neighbor session resets for capability renegotiation unless we’ve
>> specified otherwise in the protocol docs (doesn’t look like it in my quick
>> skim), and most likely force an entirely ungraceful set of updates as the
>> neighbors re-send their announcements with AS_PATH instead of BGPSEC_PATH.
> 
> likely significantly shorter than whatever time it takes to revoke, get
> new cert, install, and then go through the bgp reset.  though you will
> eventually do that anyway.
> 
> randy

I’m going to throw in a new version and ask for WGLC.

spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email