Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feasibility analysis? (was Re: RPKI and private keys)
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Sat, 12 May 2012 01:23 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281DE21F85BE for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:23:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NT0Y1QSn3H64 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B0321F8569 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbeh20 with SMTP id eh20so4789202obb.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MVK/kqWkm+0tLECX06sMW3VCUr1/TOG8reuCIEAmuuw=; b=O/QW3G/UEmBTfm2/HDBVCrk1X2tD4nSRbjXSBevmZCSBius81uh/dcERfyFRy1kzFO wCwjcSj6BZP8vNs3/9knBCALBH0eZAo3Xz2WYyJQ4BRMeSQ0XjcHlQsnOLSO8oQGLsod LmM/pPjlgL5ufBpOGK4wVxeY+90CTirGk9f1cffCJJ51odxcu6zBo4bSoWXnHY1QgAAp 5RTz7faqV4nOeinvBEelNDdbnmFYIA3D2OZKvlAaNOkEIV1NpXf/a4jHrnDjGPOGZwnv jBNoWt0J+02UwkM1v7nUMZnlYPQ/hQbqcH7T6cwqKYJferexB0BrEQLW91rxKmRYNCJP HRHQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.1.67 with SMTP id 3mr363565oek.15.1336785803263; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.166.71 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCioDW_mBWNyMy8K-jOrjdNqtnpQjdneSvWdRg0NWLNYV3w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH1iCiruThFzpef5u9NVt+3AokGnuFhq-GrbqEOkkKnVhav4zQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLab2XT-4NWr8KyHKOiQMTWqE5cTavmEr4Uw+S4zhrA=YLA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCiq3so54pE9XBM5Bp13xaERbmShipmCg=ckEySiDsh5ZPQ@mail.gmail.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930B990A66A8@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <CAH1iCirMKm1TbtBzWSKy=vHGLdYHvbtnXcwO1G9aG00n3DXmyw@mail.gmail.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930B990A6710@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930B990A6716@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <CABFLmSTVmEUMYZmXNkbhSac0_jb0o-2nPG2_58Si0SGmF0podA@mail.gmail.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C4930B985DEF48@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F70871E@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <CAH1iCio4_PaLFACs_cDZRV9c3iYhn93XqCrQrR5PD48bpyM3BA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLab0aSJBpQTtbNLq_qLbxwhXj7Y3-_aqZVeMPoTB5C8DTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH1iCioDW_mBWNyMy8K-jOrjdNqtnpQjdneSvWdRg0NWLNYV3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 21:23:23 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: -xDwsNPSE2vG8qNWHTgAyjdulaA
Message-ID: <CAL9jLabs4RtS-EsHP6DwtMbsQz6GJSCZrv24N118HMHYCDe_Sg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>, "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "sidr wg list (sidr@ietf.org)" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feasibility analysis? (was Re: RPKI and private keys)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 01:23:24 -0000
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote: > The argument that "we can't do the crypto without HW" i didn't see anyone say that though.
- [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feasibil… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Ross.Anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Ross.Anderson@cl.cam.ac.uk
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Keys and algorithms for Updates - feas… Montgomery, Douglas
- Re: [sidr] sidrKeys and algorithms for Updates - … Wes Hardaker