Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 05 January 2017 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDA2129993; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:40:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ixZR6q9pS82; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEAC612998F; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.39] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v05Me7bf047268 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:40:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.39]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:40:07 -0600
Message-ID: <ABE1F67D-115E-4512-A2AD-16513A234D95@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2fukxf8mc.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <148348795694.28027.8646303758093237302.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2d1g3mvo2.wl-randy@psg.com> <661F8C18-7B04-4E88-A97A-BBA8314C3FD4@nostrum.com> <m260lul2f8.wl-randy@psg.com> <39D04FC6-BD42-4474-BEF5-9A3C370D7A1A@nostrum.com> <m2k2a9f93d.wl-randy@psg.com> <F476162B-2388-434F-9FEB-FFFCBED5B359@nostrum.com> <m2fukxf8mc.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5319)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/IV-238KgGrXF0KCyM0TMI-9arkc>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 22:40:10 -0000

On 5 Jan 2017, at 16:24, Randy Bush wrote:

>> Thanks, that helps. Would it make the last sentence say something to
>> the effect of "... and MUST additionally be signed by the propagating
>> router."?
>
> alvaro has asked me to stop editing
>
> randy

Understood :-)