IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 08 April 2011 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840DC3A69F4 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.586
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.586 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lw0NntRi8bjd for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [147.28.0.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183073A68E0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:00:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.local.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Q8Fzd-000EEk-7s; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:01:13 +0000
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 11:01:12 -0700
Message-ID: <m2mxk04o7r.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110408170400.GC11350@juniper.net>
References: <BANLkTi=eZ=pQ2gJfiPBfeb4frH8Tncempw@mail.gmail.com> <m21v1i9ha8.wl%randy@psg.com> <BF88D659-1BE5-4DD2-AB24-7A113360DF37@cisco.com> <m2tyea7urr.wl%randy@psg.com> <8BE1C346-6214-4343-9E46-BFA8D96E4B6C@cisco.com> <BANLkTikTqCD4_=-Sjs7ng2qSLn3vYw5qLw@mail.gmail.com> <55B61488-045C-44FA-90DB-83543A6209FB@cisco.com> <m2ipupsmuy.wl%randy@psg.com> <BANLkTinoJRu=hkoiCS=Xj000r3W+n5KnZQ@mail.gmail.com> <F05F2600-9E6C-410B-9EC5-F4245E6F5B88@cisco.com> <20110408170400.GC11350@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 18:00:44 -0000

> since the pros and cons of the various transport protocols (TCP,
> TCP-MD5, TCP-AO, IPSec, SSH) are well understood, why not simply
> enumerating the choices and leave it to the operator's local security
> policy which one to deploy ?

guaranteed inter-op would be nice.  would prefer not to have "you can
run server A with router X but not with router Y.  Y needs server B.  so
you need to fully deploy two classes of servers."

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email