Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 06 June 2011 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6EC11E8154 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mdAK+g8uNhhG for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [147.28.0.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D992111E8146 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.local.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1QTawA-0007v3-Aj; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:37:50 +0000
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:37:48 +0000
Message-ID: <m2boybgh4z.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4DECDFA0.9080109@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <4DAF44AC.8060408@isi.edu> <BANLkTikLi2p7UipJ!TRSQqVOL6GkLn=j9iA@mail.gmail.com> <F0FABE61-FC1D-45ED-A21D-ED7A1228A997@isi.edu> <01eb01cc0325$6e4fd260$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4DB592B3.3090805@isi.edu> <033e01cc05a8$0a82f160$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4DB9A456.3060709@isi.edu> <BANLkTikg18FV5H0bOdOfWMzpTcm_B__EVQ@mail.gmail.com> <017b01cc13ff$0cb6da40$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <BANLkTink82qvhge6rRhqt5+h-2mEkKBMhA@mail.gmail.com> <m21uzwr3tw.wl%randy@psg.com> <BANLkTimPnMfE1ii=6uwAckoFY0yUU=w43g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinu8pxxCj4cdJzbS3z5h=8=s+U3Gw@mail.gmail.com> <D1D8138DDF34B34B8BC68A11262D10790F6233E006@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1106031624560.2148@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <D1D8138DDF34B34B8BC68A11262D10790F6233E04A@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <m2ei37gj4p.wl%randy@psg.com> <4DECDFA0.9080109@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:37:52 -0000

> I don't however understand fully why SSH is being ruled out.

it has not yet been.  for some router platforms, while they have ssh
server code, the ssh code is not a library with an api.  and the bgp
hackers are not empowered to touch that side of the code.

> That's why I suggested "MUST implement SSH; SHOULD implement TCP-AO;
> MUST prefer TCP-AO if both available"

indeed, we may have to fall back to this.  we still do not have for sure
committments that all vendors can do this.  but we're working it.

folk such as russ and sean are more tuned to timing and constraints than
i.  my job here is just to hammer on the operational realities of
delivery.

but anything that folk can do to move AO from the powerpoint platform to
the *BSD, Linux, and Solaris platforms will have long-term pay-off for
both BGP and RPKI-Rtr.

randy