Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) and BGP multipath
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 16:38 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BBC21E8234; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IP-C1YOmCwY5; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6410521E8191; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so973430ghb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5fbmyIaMKqeSwebjDiIbQam1/AAH6jiqpPOUKR7Bu/M=; b=ouOwJkG2+KvHL6OFhBK/ItUPZ8I0kL3tuWgur85OCHG4sQVBzOwIWaATvWorgat6dl NLMeWeDdLijl+ae86qUF8Z9ozBzlb95+fu9vvDcyFEp0MFX2e50m2H5YKVgQSFBAcJEf 0TxCwkRaLA3+0yz64ygkgPssph4ZU4eWhdmQdyUo2kPBDWRmi1vvJidjGgYbSF6jECyR cuhEM3wqadSYsbXvMK7HpNWfyyJyMs+vLpLe3ArLSAE6pC11pb+1SRGbCFJqNCiuHNnR 57ZitNMzSBQ9pv1IjQz2YpqttPWi4D20Xsk4F37pgk3x/5DMCR4fr6fm/iQgXwEYiSSa QXOg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.24.164 with SMTP id v4mr35010478oef.51.1332952689874; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.182.80.137 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4F733C79.8080600@raszuk.net>
References: <4F72166F.6080503@raszuk.net> <42776E13-8FFC-485F-8EC2-C93D047C3F6D@tony.li> <4F7229A0.1070109@raszuk.net> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391B3E908892@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203281401410.2692@jamaica.dcs.gla.ac.uk> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391B3EBFD895@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <FBFDBAE5-9BF8-4708-9240-B775CAF46D56@raszuk.net> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391B3EBFD924@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203281618090.2692@jamaica.dcs.gla.ac.uk> <CAL9jLaYqMwXVNKsHuBf_r8h==CGoee+D9k89Q4AZqT49jOQK1A@mail.gmail.com> <4F733C79.8080600@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:38:09 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kUkfbJ7WVX0vuV2p82qTCnfRrLg
Message-ID: <CAL9jLabVcWMtpu8usUS5w_BVPCG8ihvDcVjWbhnj_u6H-cdZkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: robert@raszuk.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "idr@ietf.org List" <idr@ietf.org>, Paul Jakma <paul@jakma.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) and BGP multipath
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:38:18 -0000
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: > Are we going to freeze any AS_PATH modifications by operator's policy too ? > I mentioned replace-as which all major vendors support. There can be more > knobs like this coming in the future. replace as i think is dealt with .... sign again and pcount=0 and move along. > CDNI is just getting extended to BGP (new SAFI) and they have their own uses > for AS_PATH being sort of over the top of classic ASes. good for them?
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Paul Jakma
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Paul Jakma
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… heasley
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [sidr] [Idr] AS_SET depreciation (RFC6472) an… Susan Hares