Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-18

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Fri, 11 November 2016 00:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAC8129638; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:22:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4AD7L9qoelm; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:22:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0104.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.201.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B0E4129626; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:22:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=VXlbJzNd09C8sSYsQ5bMG7LT/nGh3nMY6nidra1MNgk=; b=BiVJn0xx/oFyr1MzM5WjKMSHadnxPhVpDWixTE9Z9zlsG49jhFTD1HVFdRq9xi6IA0H3/vARWIUqD3h91dyatSwwKTnJeS+kUPctfLFriWKwPxCu0EyLPfZ1o3YiqLDXPzwOTIXvcKgnMdhBDO8bck59UM4ztysG/Sw+cC2Vk1g=
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.145) by DM2PR09MB0448.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.707.6; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:22:23 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) by DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0707.013; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:22:23 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-18
Thread-Index: AQHSNR6CtOW/YAot7EOz/vffo+bn+6DS9YiZ
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:22:23 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR09MB044641391D5F6ADEB278976584BB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <D401650E.13F93A%aretana@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D401650E.13F93A%aretana@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.219.183]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR09MB0448; 7:z4kl1+lmQHQoY/VxwwaG4aYquDC7Q54FtoVi5/zO80+YrnwPa9BtNVLPCLLU+EaNOW8rBAvWRSKC55Fa5vEmFz8pqzIlK1QBLByAktDohgnxGgIrmG3j6wDIHdFdG40N2hUIlCVN1D6hxD8lEl3oSquXxi+MMpC5PHqfKkRz8XuVw27nON/yWk8SU9Z8SC7gWPPsDWQ7iThrnS4d3G451gnaCpVHuUj3+dncEvR6wvpck8ueOZIzC2uGbNTFIeGSe+LUNi5tSDuivNKWxSWPXK6lzcssRjeXQ92hzGRfNZoGTXw6mL8YluNXtQC12qhTI70boq6ru6q1JgwicJ2rxgtPCN4FJiLVTMGQzYDVX/8=
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 671bb01b-2bec-4d2a-17c9-08d409c8cef7
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR09MB0448B612D8057026C9101B6484BB0@DM2PR09MB0448.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448;
x-forefront-prvs: 012349AD1C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(7846002)(33656002)(92566002)(6116002)(77096005)(5660300001)(3846002)(2900100001)(102836003)(8936002)(586003)(2501003)(345774005)(2906002)(101416001)(50986999)(76576001)(76176999)(99286002)(54356999)(5001770100001)(74316002)(9686002)(106356001)(305945005)(4326007)(97736004)(106116001)(7696004)(87936001)(2950100002)(3660700001)(7736002)(122556002)(189998001)(230783001)(66066001)(86362001)(68736007)(3280700002)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(105586002)(229853002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; H:DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Nov 2016 00:22:23.5140 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0448
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/MYeCA8tgYthEJCXrRjghQVeKS74>
Cc: "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-18
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:22:30 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

Thank you for the review and the excellent set of comments.
We (editors/authors) will consider all you comments 
and respond / make changes in the document soon.

>The biggest concern I have with this document is the lack of an 
>Operations and Management Considerations Section –

It would be nice if we can discuss this suggestion in particular in Seoul next week.

Sriram