Re: [sidr] BGPSEC Threat Model ID

"George, Wes" <> Thu, 03 November 2011 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7169711E812D for <>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.825
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.825 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.638, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PqUC4FheMe8w for <>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC211E811B for <>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 11:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,450,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="293113610"
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 03 Nov 2011 14:08:57 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 14:13:04 -0400
From: "George, Wes" <>
To: Randy Bush <>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:13:02 -0400
Thread-Topic: [sidr] BGPSEC Threat Model ID
Thread-Index: AcyaUOft5V0l21blQrqqENT5G5M8HQAAiJ/Q
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <p06240807cad42f85eb7d@[]> <> <p06240801cad6ab773279@[]> <> <p06240801cad800485596@[]> <> <p06240808cad85ff73d61@[]> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Paul Hoffman <>, sidr wg list <>
Subject: Re: [sidr] BGPSEC Threat Model ID
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:13:05 -0000

> From: Randy Bush []
> hint: the reqs draft was based first on draft-ietf-rpsec-bgpsecrec-10.
> randy
A useful thing to have noted in the document itself for us young whippersnappers, perhaps in the acknowledgements.
I also note that there is good additional discussion in 4.1, 4.5, while the reqs draft only includes the bulleted items. Cf. my email about including more explicit performance envelope requirements.

Wes George

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.