IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6C3129C4F; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:07:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.418
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.418 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5GT5DItZAsT8; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87ADB129C4D; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:07:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1726; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1481555274; x=1482764874; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=1FpoEantdDYGWBLJqSbIFMXfbDjQ26zuA2lUmvSPNz0=; b=SUq5djmoQUPbrD/c5+ubIfptY+FRKCtTpIcqhF0g4bGrzlcenEUlqZ7K KxF242lyxqo7AEUEjAozYKfJqYYaZtqfOKHxkaiURZ2TgT+iGSkJfgYUH yxWd/bMYW0ZkmdJDTfGwGwKIVmX6GhrjF3a6+LoELPSBvTMHJmDtXVwxJ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsAgDkvE5Y/49dJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzcBAQEBAR+BYAe1B4JEgg+CCIYhAhqBWUATAQIBAQEBAQEBYiiEaQYjEUUQAgEGAg4MAiYCAgIwFQULAgQBDQWIa44WnUqCKIsaAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYELhTOBfYJeh0wtgjABBIhjjB2FawGRJZBGkhkBIAE1gR8yAQGDY4FFcocOgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,336,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="359856425"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Dec 2016 15:07:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBCF7jQl009310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:07:45 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:07:45 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:07:45 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHSVHx2bYZERYyedkSxJ+s3GtgK96EEesUA
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:07:45 +0000
Message-ID: <7C970123-C954-44D8-B24B-BCA2BA294BBB@cisco.com>
References: <148154966702.22433.12175370874876571095.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148154966702.22433.12175370874876571095.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <776F5DE758DFC04981D6E93681319CCD@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/OofEbzdDAvrK-DK7WK1xHwHlNUs>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, "Sandra L. Murphy" <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:07:59 -0000

On 12/12/16, 8:34 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:

Mirja:

Hi!

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Just a thought: Would it be useful to add an IESG note saying something
> like in the sheperd write-up:
> "[...] there are published references
>    that preceded the filing of the patent, especially those 
>    mentioned in RFC6090.  RFC6090 notes that its descriptions
>    "may be useful for implementing the fundamental algorithms without 
>    using any of the  specialized methods that were developed in 
>    following years.""
> I know we usuall don't do things like this. But I'm wondering how someone
> who wants to implement this should figure this out otherwise....?

I think we would be getting too close to taking a stance on the validity, enforceability of the IPR.  The WG has already discussed and chose to go ahead.

RFC6090 is a normative reference for this document, pointing at the signature algorithm to be used.  Any implementer would have to at least check out RFC6090 and would find the text above in the Abstract.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email