IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04.txt> (An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services) to Proposed Standard

Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Thu, 29 December 2016 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6C0129736; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:15:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zceQlcZPjxKl; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from khatovar.hactrn.net (khatovar.hactrn.net [IPv6:2001:418:8006::30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FBD612970A; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 15:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (c-73-47-197-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.47.197.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nargothrond.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (not verified)) by khatovar.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1482313998; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 23:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minas-ithil.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4552D456B7F2; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:15:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:15:47 -0500
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
In-Reply-To: <01f101d260f9$dee15c00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <148226796672.23778.11324483834700038816.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <01f101d260f9$dee15c00$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20161229231547.4552D456B7F2@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/QVWZFkLrojrwjeCAwnLjzdqnztI>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup-04.txt> (An Out-Of-Band Setup Protocol For RPKI Production Services) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 23:15:15 -0000

At Wed, 28 Dec 2016 10:55:15 +0000, tom p. wrote:
> 
> When I saw BPKI in the Abstract, I thought 'typo'!  Reading on, it
> isn't; in which case, it needs expanding in the Abstract.
> 
> Appendix A is in RelaxNG; I would like a reference for that language.
> 
> Is Appendix A Normative?  i.e. in the event of a mismatch between the
> body of the I-D and Appendix A, which wins?  If Appendix A, then that
> reference should be Normative.

Thanks for the review!  I agree with all of the above, will post
revisions post-LC unless there is reason to update sooner.

Yes, I think the RelaxNG schema had best be normative.  We already
found and fixed one minor disagreement between text and schema;
unsurprisingly, running code in that case agreed with the schema.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email