Re: [sidr] about a router AS-related certificate

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 17 October 2011 14:53 UTC

Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240806cac1efb44b4c@[128.89.89.93]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110131917350.4820@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110131917350.4820@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:47:03 -0400
To: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] about a router AS-related certificate
Precedence: list

At 10:50 AM -0400 10/14/11, Sandra Murphy wrote:
>The wg has just demonstrated a lack of support for adoption of a 
>suggested cert profile for routers in 
>draft-turner-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles.
>
>Unfortunately, a router certificate is already mentioned in existing 
>wg drafts.

Sandy,

Since the WG is proceeding with the BGPSEC protocol and architecture,
there is a need for a cert profile for routers. It also makes sense to have
these certs be tied to the RPLI, since theses certs are linked to the
AS# of the net with which the router is associated.  So, I believe that
WG members (including me?) were not paying attention for this call 
for adoption.

Can we have a do over :-)?

Steve

[sidr] about a router AS-related certificate Sandra Murphy
Re: [sidr] about a router AS-related certificate … Sandra Murphy
Re: [sidr] about a router AS-related certificate Stephen Kent
Re: [sidr] about a router AS-related certificate Warren Kumari