Re: [sidr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 06 April 2018 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F100E1201FA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCyvNqskmH3c for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF031250B8 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 71-v6so1181049oie.12 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:24:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CNfDE35ewgA6IGO8GHJJVYlzvUHfwgUmY/tNSDBxsPs=; b=0+IDNbBX/wnwaQi3qzOET8urbnGCx+BNQB3CwqqMotctsmvAX44sFM3ZKNIlvsxN6C 7YnzmM7kZsB3drTEyNmWokJgqgHNM9nd0uga0arKGMwVYDbEcteiSe18Ab/9ANzdb3WN pDUSO8DoFi48gYYJKEeKCSdGe8+iptBuzRbjK8es5Cg/HtvUE/0KwX2pZoFpbioAKkUV zEjSiTlcCaTa4R3W939o1NnAWE7AnTFsF5fKy3jcMz1yegsfxktujduuiQORZ+Ph+cYg l7KrYJHqyCKq1WCGo1k5CLSWPASK1KJSkUrgCicBgfx7bUaMBvulkL6kCn/B6Ag5QOMQ ktQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CNfDE35ewgA6IGO8GHJJVYlzvUHfwgUmY/tNSDBxsPs=; b=hCho2LJJpERG3Fe/8upsUDTogjYysMH2KVPmAa8ot51PxQuSkW5ybKHLxRIxIHKhPD A659bMvI7E5XDn6mn15MB96otai7UXjmEMdfGB0FU4234VkwZ0Z5/Cxrn3M8/teaAJW6 nZZ43rUttBtLPE8ZalJ+KQT2qjvHc38slapqbRBn56W2O9Ih3+bMTQlRSPsy3ad7dZJ0 Srphz3/PlwJ978qOUIKVsalWZGmgRysZP6dBlJyMvjtKve4bn+IkU4SKSTK3To0z5B7h mhQMvpGMIUGVn60y0ekz9kuaaeC/yBZ89uXUlA6bDkPyH6J5rJpBoiRRo+fIxWZMOe9I RvEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tALjpEau6eIkjTwViuAcTiqhAErWOnFBkuZQ0yE5orFnNeYSS2s y+FDcpVp+M0TxdAE+IKloPxLGsSLnGRgJPqXppUKX+hT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx499wdvu/OK3OBWqWb8+fg05KrH8Pk+7G3KHIb5lO0A8RNFShVeXQHJJOnPQ37/iSXomy/9mfYxMVEYImT8v8YM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:c592:: with SMTP id v140-v6mr16041411oif.92.1523024684593; Fri, 06 Apr 2018 07:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.138.18.130 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DAD2FBEF-5606-49A7-B871-F480FF5DBDB0@zdns.cn>
References: <152268817614.31085.6790269677708093564.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DAD2FBEF-5606-49A7-B871-F480FF5DBDB0@zdns.cn>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 07:24:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBP02PrKYo8ZWFOzvz6ddqGS4oQqamY5Qa7Bofkimc4ucw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, draft-ietf-sidr-slurm@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org, sidr-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004f47a405692ed1d8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/TWqPd5zCSUjlaLih-j29w7awhXc>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 14:24:48 -0000

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 7:19 AM, Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn> wrote:

> >
> >          contained by any prefix in any <prefixAssertions> or
> >          <prefixFilters> in file Z.
> >
> > OK, so you are going to error out even if there are assertions which are
> > identical?
> >
> >
>
> Duplicate assertions are idempotent, but the RPKI to Router Protocol
> explicitly filters out duplicates in the communication with the router.
>

Hmm... That's not how I read this text. I read it rather that if the same
exceptions
in two files, it caused an error. So maybe some clarification needed.

-Ekr


> Di
>
>
>
>