[sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-04.txt

[Randy Bush <[e-mail]>]

at this afternoon's sidr ssion, i presented two open issue with
draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-04.txt

1 - Should updates learned via iBGP be marked?

2 - Should updates injected into BGP on this router be marked?

i think yes because:
  o i want support of incremental deployment
  o i do not want to find out I am announcing garbage when my neighbor’s
    NOC calls, mis-originations should be stopped at the source

there was fear that, if used at other than edge routers, this allowed
creation of loops, as setting local pref etc, do.

i think there was general agreement that this was ok on edge routers
and the point of injection, as that is logically an edge router.

would like to see convergence on this

thanks

randy