Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

Christopher Morrow <> Mon, 14 November 2011 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75AA21F84CC for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:07:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.54
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AzKjxieQaflm for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:07:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567D011E80BD for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:06:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so8922871iae.31 for <>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:06:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4dsI/CNOJh5RtwYEFz9EhVFSE2uyFzht5wvBNHfoOtc=; b=n8w8aoIN0YOEXrw2JKp5qUDLMpHcbSkGbJIIEHcefMqjUUPyRG3ATS/0i/TClsz96U J2bNvyRtBLus7XI7qVKXVYLs9umlqXPiFOTBLGUWMKHZb2LUfMbyJNnFo2PxYKP5fnMM FnByCVS50nc4LRq5mJMfGvoVh+o22dvTImbm8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with SMTP id r14mr5025544ibf.5.1321254406714; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with HTTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:06:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 02:06:46 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: fweTTwTVJtivNDmCz45zmFaW2ZE
Message-ID: <>
From: Christopher Morrow <>
To: "George, Wes" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: sidr wg list <>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 07:07:05 -0000

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:41 AM, George, Wes <> wrote:
>> From:
>> there were a slew of changes (or a slew of comments made) requested, a
>> document update happened ~13 days ago, did the changes account for the
>> comments/requests or not?
> [WEG] I diffed 11 and 12 when 12 came out, and no, not really. As I recall, Shane already replied that the proposed text (that made it into -12) was not adequate in explaining rationale around the recommendation of "close" for RPKI cache placement, among other things. (cf. emails on 10/31). Don't know if additional changes are pending for -13 based on those comments, but the mail thread died on the 31st with no further responses.

ok, I was/am looking for status. I think randy replied to shane's note
(or another note form shane) a bit ago, and talks some about 'close'.
I believe that a new version just arrived in the repository as well.


> Wes George
> This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.