IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] review/adoption of draft-george-sidr-as-migration

"Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com> Fri, 31 May 2013 09:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rogaglia@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5237C21F83EF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ijBGrc4EiLz for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A589021F973A for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 02:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7054; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1369992406; x=1371202006; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=DQbiH1nqJAfmQhwzAjepB3FHAzl7GjA98e0OZ3u/Sjc=; b=OfRiB6izVrTvFg0oaKGzgl3JQYNfnFm2A4duxlwiQkKuNO8KMJ0vo+XL 1e9DIqqkU/KzolUrVBNb/Ub8Fp4D1aw0zAGfImxYAH2cHSJxqjBLxEb6h ocf4mOhjP4BP8HxsDdgleXw99DW3HttTzgTjrTadkks+Us53OoKR9XmIr c=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4459
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQFAF5rqFGtJXG//2dsb2JhbABagwmDJbt0gQEWdIIjAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgiJAIwJQIEDgUIBod5BrtPjmsxB4J2YQOQAIEsl1KDD4In
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,777,1363132800"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="217109592"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2013 09:26:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com [173.36.12.80]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4V9Qjvv025144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 May 2013 09:26:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.4.15]) by xhc-aln-x06.cisco.com ([173.36.12.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 31 May 2013 04:26:45 -0500
From: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] review/adoption of draft-george-sidr-as-migration
Thread-Index: AQHOXUyOyXB9njV5wUySjq73F/58qA==
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:26:44 +0000
Message-ID: <EF4348D391D0334996EE9681630C83F0220E7630@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com>
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD59230433EF5B73@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <EF4348D391D0334996EE9681630C83F0220E6B06@xmb-rcd-x02.cisco.com> <m2mwrcxsvw.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2mwrcxsvw.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.147.19.72]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FD05A56E-A8F6-45A9-9967-E550B5F12360"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr wg list (sidr@ietf.org)" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] review/adoption of draft-george-sidr-as-migration
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:26:52 -0000

Randy,

On May 30, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> The document is intended as "Informational" but do have requirement
>> language.
> 
> normative language in an info doc is perfectly normal and acceptable.
> 
> this doc does not create protcol, protocol data elements, ...  it says
> HOW to do some tricks with already defined protocol and pdus.  so info
> seems not unreasonable to me.

That is why I was proposing moving it to BCP.

> 
> btw, this is a *really* cute bit of work.

+1

Roque

> randy

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status