Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 17 January 2017 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7A6129546; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:54:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eNZ-HpCKdFV1; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2494F129426; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 07:54:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4238; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1484668457; x=1485878057; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=tiupgJyg4l4BJIFDr6tK71IelyYhR8wz/hrmGDx+AYQ=; b=Y7gDFBC/nZIiDCQSaZgKvOMZg+ctHWeLss0PdA1wCOQxIcsfL9J2EHqi 2BCg6PGMCLl/yypt4mUnttImIRJaD8yqrL5oVzNCKLRutCjmaUlpSw1cu TqAAXrcRrAb3qf/rdH/8NL2IBxlfgV+SbgRDWUrHulCcQyUNu2iiDjEMd E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ArAQA7PX5Y/5RdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9KAQEBAQEfX4EJB4NKigeReZAgUIJMgg+CC4YiAhqBeD8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYyiEagYjVhACAQgEOwMCAgIwFAYLAgQOBYkDr0WCJSuJWQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAR2GRYICCIJdh04tgjEFmzoBkV6QbZJrAR84gUQVSgGEWoFHc4dLgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,245,1477958400"; d="scan'208,217";a="194197960"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jan 2017 15:54:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v0HFsGKQ015465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:54:16 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:54:15 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:54:15 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHScLGgbhRfSiDCEU+RaxlXyOSsTqE84V2AgABVOYD//6yygA==
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:54:15 +0000
Message-ID: <A6A1E781-8019-4152-B646-FA23CC76E0AA@cisco.com>
References: <148355465867.12949.10785749487953700357.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM2PR09MB0446C09E1BE1CEE94D43852684780@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <B636DF13-0DAC-4DD9-876A-5AA02ECD4294@kuehlewind.net> <9B17A0C3-3430-4643-9D0C-B4554FF04510@cisco.com> <1348EA28-8876-4B85-9F39-1AB74A5C6333@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <1348EA28-8876-4B85-9F39-1AB74A5C6333@kuehlewind.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1d.0.161209
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A6A1E78180194152B646FA23CC76E0AAciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/WJ64R3Udi2jQlHwGmjmbx78F0Lw>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>, "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:54:18 -0000

ACK

On 1/17/17, 10:52 AM, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net<mailto:ietf@kuehlewind.net>> wrote:

thanks for the very clear clarification. Not sure if it’s just me or if that’s not clearly stated in the draft, but maybe it would be worth it double-checking.