Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: (with COMMENT)
Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> Tue, 31 January 2017 00:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76617129759; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:40:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UJ2n3w0hNs7c; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from adrilankha.hactrn.net (adrilankha.hactrn.net [147.28.0.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5B1129789; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 16:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (c-73-47-197-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [73.47.197.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "nargothrond.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (not verified)) by adrilankha.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14628B97F; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:39:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from minas-ithil.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minas-ithil.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3914665264; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:39:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:39:21 -0500
From: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <148477318982.2006.5926498434357117741.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148477318982.2006.5926498434357117741.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20170131003921.5D3914665264@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/WTSk9H6-9pLhCEXaj-aJBPZPpyI>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-publication@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 00:40:00 -0000
At Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:59:49 -0800, Ben Campbell wrote: ... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Most of my comments have already been made by others. But with the > questions about upgrade paths, I see there is in fact a "version" element > defined. How is that expected to be used? I don't see a version related > error code. In the most straightforward implementation, wrong version would show up as a schema validation error. We could certainly add an error code for this if you prefer, just didn't think of it.
- [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sidr] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Rob Austein