Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)
"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 12 December 2016 21:45 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8F5129CDD for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:45:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MSp72CNlKfgp for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:45:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC5A21294AF for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:45:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 21556 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2016 22:38:32 +0100
Received: from p5dec2f57.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.47.87) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 12 Dec 2016 22:38:32 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <m2bmwh2ezn.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:38:30 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <43042837-7603-4C8F-8EA5-2E37E0986B79@kuehlewind.net>
References: <148154966702.22433.12175370874876571095.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7C970123-C954-44D8-B24B-BCA2BA294BBB@cisco.com> <94724E1D-5EA3-46A3-80F9-4E4636D1266F@nostrum.com> <m2bmwh2ezn.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/WfGpC10lpujxPjH69MGTjBX9Z10>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs@ietf.org>, "Sandra L. Murphy" <sandy@tislabs.com>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 21:45:17 -0000
Yes, just wanted to make sure implementors have the information they need to make a decision. The text cited from the shepherd write-up only says that RFC6090 predates the patent filing; without a judgement or validity check. However, that was just a thought/question. If the answer is no that’s fine. Mirja > Am 12.12.2016 um 19:12 schrieb Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>: > >> It's the implementors problem to consider IPR issues even without a >> disclosure. > > and ours not to lead them into ipr with no warning. > > randy >
- [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)