[sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)

"Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 04 January 2017 16:20 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A239129658; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:20:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <148354685349.12965.6263489032913962215.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:20:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/XcX9SB3C0f9ExC3O1YltIih_N84>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: [sidr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 16:20:55 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-21: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- I share various people's concerns about the deployability of this
protocol, but I realize this is where the WG ended up after many years of
work so fingers crossed, I guess.

- Fig 2: Shouldn't the signatures in Sig Block 2 have different
identifiers (e.g., X2, Y2) than those in Sig Block 1?

- Sec 6.1: "(likely a small number of years)" -- given how hard these
things are to predict, is it wise to include this text here?

- I was surprised not to see an example message or two in this document.