Return-Path: X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B5911E80B0 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:36:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mILCqqn38ag8 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F84311E8093 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:36:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pmohapat@cisco.com; l=1581; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1321169799; x=1322379399; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=dLyw3XEjg2mmLyPvC2x33q6Mc2bk7P/TbZNgg+sPdTc=; b=KYjHfjQPE9YXpUciN/K135p6SZy2HeurhpXxvr/aCnt+pPXfJ4OzlUXv oeu8hUBfWoa/zXNaTCX4r4t2FxKrEa9jLNnFSTH1dTWO8W2XaN/27gD7p PtXsQDOWyOrbW5a/bf3wKOcMbxrurW0eTDYWI5ixmI6T9ahj+i5LRjFKB M=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EABhyv06rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABCqi+BBYFpCQEBAQMBEgFmBQsLAwFCVwY1h2CYHQGdLIkcYwSIEIwekho X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.69,502,1315180800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="13889346" Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2011 07:36:38 +0000 Received: from sjc-vpn4-362.cisco.com (sjc-vpn4-362.cisco.com [10.21.81.106]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pAD7aclU024056; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:36:38 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--734786020 From: Pradosh Mohapatra In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:36:37 -0800 Message-Id: <8893BDFC-6BF9-4AB9-9C8B-FCF00F37A621@cisco.com> References: To: Danny McPherson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2) Cc: sidr wg list Subject: Re: [sidr] Question about draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-03 X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:36:41 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1--734786020 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes > My read of the current draft suggests that if there's a route > generated by the > local AS in BGP it could never have a "Valid" state, and by > definition would > either posses a "Not found" or "Invalid" state -- even though the > local > AS may well have a "ROA" and reside in the mapping table as well(!). Is there a need to compute validation state of an IBGP path? - Pradosh --Apple-Mail-1--734786020 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

My read of the current draft suggests that if there's a route generated by the
local AS in BGP it could never have a "Valid" state, and by definition would
either posses a "Not found" or "Invalid" state -- even though the local
AS may well have a "ROA" and reside in the mapping table as well(!).

Is there a need to compute validation state of an IBGP path?

- Pradosh

--Apple-Mail-1--734786020--