IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Mon, 29 January 2018 20:36 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBD8126CF9; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:36:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqRDDqxpX2Is; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0134.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.201.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03FB412FB27; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 12:36:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=MeyuWJlJzUwQ7h7vpmbn7ZOIDWCBTZ/RN4aQSlrwYNQ=; b=mYT5RctQOGOQhXeOp2UmLgJPeaFXE0mmBvTgeHbkLTY1M/GjqTB3FtqazSfbH/3mP4RbhHtIpm0cFsoT0Z/cbhNVWL9P5eE3KBAGKK6TYspFcRVENXaGtZPUTyPoTixDquKGcXJJ82ZoUenG6JQxyPIHraecFQPiR5tptn6FmCg=
Received: from DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.17) by DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.444.14; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 20:36:52 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4017:83d3:c343:fdb6]) by DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4017:83d3:c343:fdb6%18]) with mapi id 15.20.0444.016; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 20:36:52 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-sidr-slurm@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-slurm@ietf.org>
CC: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04
Thread-Index: AQHTmS4Ff7xRcKiiDUW92yPkN3RlL6OLR8ew
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 20:36:51 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR09MB055943E50F1E08DC82BED08484E50@DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAMMESsw1i_Am0UOS0Tx6yfz7kb_jsaxhMZtu5rcsoM4cDeVfkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsw1i_Am0UOS0Tx6yfz7kb_jsaxhMZtu5rcsoM4cDeVfkw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.140.122]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR09MB0559; 7:F4aChWy+2CkSRuRvxU82y3a1/cWW69xKj9uRWJX6RfeLadHgP06J6KAlaMZm8NFxDt5IHKoYIyYZkOEKcpYCAcSR+Yk1KP/taUo05uZqfvK+H+5zqRmtVA3BieB+P1MkYFw/agokwBFgrAC2wxtxOP3BXc37NeHx5j+qMdKHpLU4tmMC0DeW7EZnzqvAQIDagnsn7KvXaZ/7Bflhhm7ye00mExLG0hf3M/aCDhGj/YE6xP6MgUqr9drtlZPFwAmW
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;SSOR;
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI; SCL:-1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(346002)(39380400002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(2906002)(6116002)(86362001)(3846002)(66066001)(186003)(68736007)(3660700001)(3280700002)(14454004)(790700001)(7696005)(2501003)(5250100002)(76176011)(110136005)(54906003)(55016002)(2950100002)(9686003)(106356001)(6306002)(54896002)(26005)(316002)(966005)(5660300001)(236005)(53936002)(59450400001)(2900100001)(105586002)(6246003)(33656002)(81156014)(19609705001)(478600001)(606006)(8936002)(7736002)(6506007)(74316002)(102836004)(229853002)(39060400002)(6436002)(99286004)(81166006)(25786009)(8676002)(4326008)(97736004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0559; H:DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 02af9677-8d14-4d48-6b0f-08d567580759
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0559;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM2PR09MB0559:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR09MB0559165444B96BB9A717C49584E50@DM2PR09MB0559.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(189930954265078)(219752817060721)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(3231101)(944501161)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041288)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0559; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0559;
x-forefront-prvs: 0567A15835
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Cj6AlLw6EzCg61UBsLHe1yPMvuEk5OnGXC/xD7BHdB46Dnu2aAyH9/uxAxCpCBqToAyddFG9w6GJtgSmGbzWSg==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM2PR09MB055943E50F1E08DC82BED08484E50DM2PR09MB0559namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 02af9677-8d14-4d48-6b0f-08d567580759
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 29 Jan 2018 20:36:51.9626 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0559
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/ZMhdrnn2tpJsmPUkBMxQ_BBo7Bg>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 20:36:57 -0000

David, Di, Tim:

These are minor comments in alignment with Alvaro’s.

Alvaro wrote:

>M4. References:

>M4.1. s/I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview/rfc8205  ...and should be Normative.

>M4.3. [minor] Please update the references according to the Nits [1].

>[1] https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04.txt<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fidnits%3Furl%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04.txt&data=02%7C01%7Ckotikalapudi.sriram%40nist.gov%7Cc59432d1b20b4ceb46a508d567451e8e%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636528468933957141&sdata=5QbjZdDuSy9CgDHN4gKAPsJ5EpRwJbFIVpn6Lh7d7D0%3D&reserved=0>

With regard to updating the references, I noticed that the draft references
[I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview] in two places where it should reference
BGPsec Protocol Specification [RFC 8205].  For example, on page 3:

(Validation of the origin of a route is
   described in [RFC6483], and validation of the path of a route is
   described in [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview].)

For “validation of the path of a route” the pointer should be Section 5 of RFC 8205.

AFAIK, [I-D.ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview] is expired and there are no plans to publish it.

I would also suggest that both RFCs 6483 and 6811 can be referenced when
talking about “Validation of the origin of a route.”  RFC 6811 is Standards Track
while 6483 is Informational.

Thanks.

Sriram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email