Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07

"Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net> Mon, 13 March 2017 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <carlos@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669A41296F7; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IWmQeABqQ4S8; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (hermes.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::8]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C356312962E; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.lacnic.net.uy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070C016B414BF; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:44:46 -0300 (UYT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lacnic.net.uy
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy ([127.0.0.1]) by hermes.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSIeOfLzeCXg; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:44:45 -0300 (UYT)
Received: from [200.7.87.71] (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:7000:3418:572e:53b8:3d0e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9B6416B414BE; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:44:45 -0300 (UYT)
From: "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>
To: "Rob Austein" <sra@hactrn.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 12:44:45 -0300
Message-ID: <0C92FF0E-E19E-4CA0-967A-D35B17AD203B@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170313151657.281B65DDF63@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
References: <5821A5CF-EFF8-4CE3-9AA4-CFDB9C903D63@cisco.com> <20170311222527.324125ACF21@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <yj9ok27upcws.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <6359B4B1-478D-4017-B259-7B60BA55FF39@zdns.cn> <68C71545-48E4-40B8-91AC-88DE44C4125D@ripe.net> <20170313131155.D22115DCF34@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <4E57BAB1-8241-495E-A201-D785FFF3AEC9@ripe.net> <20170313151657.281B65DDF63@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/ZlWtYmYkshWUojia6RKIA9poP9M>
Cc: "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:44:50 -0000

Rob,

On 13 Mar 2017, at 12:16, Rob Austein wrote:

> You are making assumptions about how the library code works.  As it
> happens, those assumptions are incorrect for the OpenSSL case.

can you expand on this ? I think if you help us on this front a lot of 
the concerns and misunderstandings will be sorted out.

Best regards,

-Carlos