IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00

John Curran <jcurran@arin.net> Sun, 14 July 2013 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <jcurran@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537B221F9FBD for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HC3ZcvILqfG4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A14C21F9B7F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id F2DB7165166; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ASHXCH01.corp.arin.net (ashxch01.corp.arin.net [199.43.0.17]) by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6247C16515F; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by ASHXCH01.corp.arin.net (199.43.0.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.421.2; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:37 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH02.corp.arin.net ([169.254.2.236]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:36 -0400
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00
Thread-Index: AQHOgFHSYdjl7AtLxEeu76auZ5BeJQ==
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 05:20:14 +0000
Message-ID: <95789E5C-80B0-4307-9471-C116DB8219A5@arin.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6749A84D9@CVA-MB001.centreville.ads.sparta.com> <m2r4f3whgd.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2r4f3whgd.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.149.252.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C6FB60E98E3FAE42BCBD9111E39E8EBE@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 05:20:50 -0000

On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:18 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> i do not support this draft.  it is not needed technically or
> operationally. 

If that's the case for you, then don't use it on your certs.  However, your 
requirements don't necessarily encompass all RPKI users, and overall system
robustness is improved by having the policy qualifier language in RFC6487 
more clearly line up with RFC5280 since they are going to be in use by others.

FYI,
/John

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status