Return-Path: <jcurran@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
 with ESMTP id 537B221F9FBD for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HC3ZcvILqfG4 for
 <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by
 ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A14C21F9B7F for <sidr@ietf.org>;
 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id F2DB7165166;
 Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ASHXCH01.corp.arin.net (ashxch01.corp.arin.net [199.43.0.17])
 by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6247C16515F;
 Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by ASHXCH01.corp.arin.net
 (199.43.0.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.421.2;
 Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:37 -0400
Received: from CHAXCH02.corp.arin.net ([169.254.2.236]) by
 CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009;
 Sun, 14 Jul 2013 01:20:36 -0400
From: John Curran <jcurran@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00
Thread-Index: AQHOgFHSYdjl7AtLxEeu76auZ5BeJQ==
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 05:20:14 +0000
Message-ID: <95789E5C-80B0-4307-9471-C116DB8219A5@arin.net>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6749A84D9@CVA-MB001.centreville.ads.sparta.com>
 <m2r4f3whgd.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2r4f3whgd.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [192.149.252.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <C6FB60E98E3FAE42BCBD9111E39E8EBE@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>,
 "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wglc draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-00
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>,
 <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>,
 <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 05:20:50 -0000

On Jul 12, 2013, at 6:18 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> i do not support this draft.  it is not needed technically or
> operationally.=20

If that's the case for you, then don't use it on your certs.  However, your=
=20
requirements don't necessarily encompass all RPKI users, and overall system
robustness is improved by having the policy qualifier language in RFC6487=20
more clearly line up with RFC5280 since they are going to be in use by othe=
rs.

FYI,
/John




=20
  =