Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-01.txt

Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com> Mon, 11 July 2011 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <bew@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682B811E8114 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.266
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.266 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.666, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIN+RebE+C4h for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F06521F8D2D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:14:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=bew@cisco.com; l=918; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1310411660; x=1311621260; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=t75xxKwbXn5psb/5vy++CtKq4Uul+zht0igNdbquJ9I=; b=IwpgDFE1Q3hHPzYQhJL3ojrRRhr3th6BztdIpbxQyxjGPUhIjbJ7k1ol SkLmKE1ja1I20rPyBbN4W1bMO+RnhaVjLMkhCNUoIWwuynzJ1fbkaV3zk XpmPHfZEYulhOAHvV1FBh3uMNvApIWavZ6MgHHceqLJC9sADu+UV1D8kU Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,517,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="1835071"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2011 19:14:19 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-213.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-213.cisco.com [10.32.244.213]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6BJEJFb005609; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:14:19 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Brian Weis <bew@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240805ca40eb99b038@[128.89.89.24]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 12:14:19 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0F1E331D-6749-483A-B69D-B4D62DE76447@cisco.com>
References: <20110708161252.27961.972.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <42FAFCD2-C5F0-471C-8E90-A6AF0EC17DE6@cisco.com> <AAA28269-7DC5-4E19-A05B-6FAA4DF01388@cisco.com> <C6D4299F-7C55-4420-B114-A829533A981C@cisco.com> <p06240805ca40eb99b038@[128.89.89.24]>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org wg" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-algorithm-agility-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:14:28 -0000

On Jul 11, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Stephen Kent wrote:

> At 11:29 AM +0200 7/11/11, Roque Gagliano wrote:
>> ...
>> (Roque) These are the "CA that have children and with whom the signaling is carried out through the provisioning protocol".
>> 
>> What about changing the definition to"
>> 
>> Non-Leaf CA: A CA that issues certificates to external entities by using the provisioning protocol described in [PROV.].
> 
> I disagree with Brian here.  the prov protocol is one way to have certs issued,
> but it is not the only way, e.g., see the managed CA services offered by most
> of the RIRs.  I'd prefer the definition I suggested in my (belated) reply to Brian's message.

I agree that Steve's definition is clearer.

Thanks,
Brian

> 
> Steve


-- 
Brian Weis
Security Standards and Technology, SRTG, Cisco Systems
Telephone: +1 408 526 4796
Email: bew@cisco.com