IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Question about draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-03

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Sun, 13 November 2011 08:05 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B8621F8AD1 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HDbAFeRIH24d for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dog.tcb.net (dog.tcb.net [64.78.150.133]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F1521F8AD2 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 00:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dog.tcb.net (Postfix, from userid 0) id 0717D268063; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:05:15 -0700 (MST)
Received: from dhcp-1267.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-1267.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.18.103]) (authenticated-user smtp) (TLSv1/SSLv3 AES128-SHA 128/128) by dog.tcb.net with SMTP; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 01:05:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from danny@tcb.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <8893BDFC-6BF9-4AB9-9C8B-FCF00F37A621@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 03:04:57 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <D9D1E72D-AF06-4F78-BE63-20CEF5973A1C@tcb.net>
References: <E3CAD10A-758F-435F-B79F-62171DD373CC@tcb.net> <8893BDFC-6BF9-4AB9-9C8B-FCF00F37A621@cisco.com>
To: Pradosh Mohapatra <pmohapat@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Question about draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-03
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 08:05:16 -0000

On Nov 13, 2011, at 2:36 AM, Pradosh Mohapatra wrote:

> Is there a need to compute validation state of an IBGP path?

I need some way to convey in iBGP it's preference relative to other 
BGP-learned paths - how do I do that today under this architecture, 
where if it were considered under the current algorithm it may well 
be labeled "Invalid", even if a mapping exists for the local AS and 
prefix in question?

-danny

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email