Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3238)
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 04 June 2012 16:35 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4B821F876C for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cTboxSYn6PQa for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4282C21F86F0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jun 2012 09:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1SbaFm-0005NN-JY; Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:35:38 +0000
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 09:35:39 -0700
Message-ID: <m2obozox0k.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <p06240802cbf289a57437@[128.89.89.114]>
References: <20120531145543.F363272E004@rfc-editor.org> <2BAE4694-60C2-4301-BFAF-05DF49054BF4@cisco.com> <m2vcjcq7t9.wl%randy@psg.com> <p06240802cbf289a57437@[128.89.89.114]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3238)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 16:35:40 -0000
>> while i agree that the change is correct, this is not an erratum, but an >> actual change in semantics. > The text that was there could not be acted upon by a CA or an RP > requesting a cert. The cited field are in KU, not EKU, and were > already described in the immediately preceding paragraph. So, this > text, which is a MAY, just provides guidance (for a CA or RP re a cert > request) consistent with what is already described earlier in this > RFC. i do not intend to have a tantrum or even make a fuss. i just think we need to be careful what we call errata. randy
- [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3238) RFC Errata System
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6487 (3… Stephen Kent