Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 12 December 2016 19:47 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F79D129442; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:47:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MvVKUdvNC8Cb; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2864D12940F; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 11:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cGWZa-0003DL-9Z; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:47:42 +0000
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 04:47:39 +0900
Message-ID: <m21sxd2alg.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <148154966702.22433.12175370874876571095.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <148154966702.22433.12175370874876571095.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/bbh7_nlK_Z8SyS5t1rqoYn6pwwM>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs@ietf.org, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, sandy@tislabs.com, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:47:46 -0000
> Just a thought: Would it be useful to add an IESG note saying something
> like in the sheperd write-up:
> "[...] there are published references
> that preceded the filing of the patent, especially those mentioned
> in RFC6090. RFC6090 notes that its descriptions "may be useful
> for implementing the fundamental algorithms without using any of
> the specialized methods that were developed in following years.""
perhaps the simple truth would raise less objection; if it does raise
objection then i suspect something is broken.
say that there is an ipr filing on this draft and the wg considered that
and decided to go ahead anyway. also say that \cite{rfc6090} describes
relevant algorithms and has no ipr filed against it.
randy
- [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Alvaro Retana (aretana)
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draf… Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)