Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-08: (with COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 25 August 2017 12:31 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DBE132027; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwjXDXR9aEoK; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2A8C132BE6; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 05:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=850; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1503664283; x=1504873883; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=FNkY1FyPJkMKKvSUR2ImiIaMmhBQX4rnM7GDMrlVpws=; b=b2X08v0J/47Ilrm8x/RZlMJJyrFQbARMdhxMndUDxyXfNmAbw8OYhs31 c5dmsvmpL2N1kT/ufhowoAHwxwbEMwwEhhfYPXWGkfDL8OAgtscbVrCD2 x2Tf9oUxqdquMPShQzEeB44UaImRcbwvfR3oddB86Qmva/w+4CO9JUh19 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DpAgB/F6BZ/5hdJa1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBg1qBeQeeJYFPkVuEbIIShUcCGoNGQBcBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZBiMRRRACAQgaAh8HAgICMBUFCwIEAQ0FijGtV4Ini2EBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdgQ2CHYICgU6CDguCcoR1gxMwgjEFigGOKIg4ApREgXqQbJY2ASABNoENdxVbAYU6gU52h3krgQWBDwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,425,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="285389304"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2017 12:31:21 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v7PCVLbq008099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:21 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:31:21 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 07:31:21 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-08: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTHOCW9IVrgGO4rUm00Ve5wwkDVKKVEx4A
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:21 +0000
Message-ID: <626DE792-2849-4257-AC5B-2574872D4253@cisco.com>
References: <150358289918.24287.6930264240208595572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150358289918.24287.6930264240208595572.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.25.0.170815
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.236.208]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <13967404E490F446BBDCC19A62F0BF35@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/bcmgYZp3XcGLlGm3TAacEdiaH5s>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:31:26 -0000

On 8/24/17, 9:55 AM, "Mirja Kühlewind" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:

Mirja:

Hi!

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Given this new mechanism seems to be the recommended way of doing things, I
> would expect that this draft updates RFC 6487.

Previous versions of the draft Updated that and other RFCs, but the intent is to define a new mechanism, not to replace the current one yet.  After discussion, it was decided against Updating because of that.

Thanks!

Alvaro.