Re: [sidr] WGLC draft-sidr-rpki-rtr - take 2?

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 06/06/11 15:37, Randy Bush wrote:
>> That's why I suggested "MUST implement SSH; SHOULD implement TCP-AO;
>> MUST prefer TCP-AO if both available"
> 
> indeed, we may have to fall back to this.  we still do not have for sure
> committments that all vendors can do this.  but we're working it.

Cool. I'm happy to help with that to the extent that I can.

> folk such as russ and sean are more tuned to timing and constraints than
> i.  my job here is just to hammer on the operational realities of
> delivery.

I fully agree that delivery is very important in this case.

> but anything that folk can do to move AO from the powerpoint platform to
> the *BSD, Linux, and Solaris platforms will have long-term pay-off for
> both BGP and RPKI-Rtr.

Agreed again.

S.