Re: [sidr] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Wed, 28 March 2018 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E75124C27; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 01:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AHcEF4XtvDvy; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mahimahi.ripe.net (mahimahi.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1372]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B7ED1200C1; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 01:57:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by mahimahi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1f16tW-0003F2-Ld; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:57:23 +0200
Received: from sslvpn.ripe.net ([193.0.20.230] helo=vpn-185.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1f16tW-0001hF-Ho; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:57:22 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <152220897556.29881.11439165736430017715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 10:57:08 +0200
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-sidr-slurm@ietf.org, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, sidr@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7444E36-9A58-4257-AE2C-C5D498BADEAE@ripe.net>
References: <152220897556.29881.11439165736430017715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: -------
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -7.5 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -7.5 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a07198f161b6459a3fc2182e779616e55ac4d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/cGtYeyUoK2nzgcVH2z-PTaAkrKI>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:57:27 -0000


> On 28 Mar 2018, at 05:49, Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Ignas Bagdonas has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-slurm/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> A few comments:
> 
> 1. Document uses all capital form of AND for filters containing both prefixes
> and ASNs, and filters containing ASNs and SKIs. That is not part of RFC2119
> language.


Emphasis was intended, but lower case ‘and’ is fine.

> 2. s/Route Origination Authorization/Route Origin Authorization

ack

> 
> 3. If a local assertion is added without a matching filter, does it take
> priority over existing assertion?

No, local assertions are similar to ROA VRPs or Router Certificates found through validation. They are complementary.


> 4. The term 'putative TA' has been flagged a couple of times in various reviews
> as being not known. It does not appear to be formally defined, RFC7730 seems to
> be the closest source - while it is not formally defined there either.

I believe the word ‘putative’ can be dropped. It’s not like this is special kind of Trust Anchor.

Regards
Tim



> 
> 
>