From nobody Sun Aug 21 08:57:09 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04C0C14CF0A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:57:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.104 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6IIRqTqs3hb for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4189C14CE38 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id q74so6590464iod.9 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:57:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:in-reply-to:from:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=NclicrqX6MU+r1BeMJJeKLJ/ZMwTnjbdARaw8qLCzgc=; b=UYqrnQbiPJcUiZfkpRCmzhHqgyP3hBSzs4ZxhP+3DQZO+x0Nb49p6r/y87aTAPaspS DIP5hiDXaesBeW5d24YVvxrEq8FhA1lOUBCf60IOqqZDd3jndvwQ3eipxMWdzJipHZ7j PavKMkCMrzTvzIMZ+kTByX82+qIBZ4RKIu83v2+MYfmpMr0nEfOlpl2GISqMRcL8ga+S RvywsXOJtLP/ifpRrTvOWAUKkPz7SlrOldAZYRuhdPB/zXmDbhvDxuikkFE6Z6U9pRCt orM6Slz19iHsNV/TCfQLOc4OFEYAqeOsEurGW9qsgOeJZVlqVcMtMiuW90AkB5ORLCAx 5Q4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:in-reply-to:from:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=NclicrqX6MU+r1BeMJJeKLJ/ZMwTnjbdARaw8qLCzgc=; b=f3zx77eYvvOWQ4LFLwPH87Ivs6lG376Kz+AGEFBYhnJRH21r1bc+n0sJgZO4WhNTVQ QJvJEOUu384aCDjjSxwHRDdnM/WZ4rOQDOXCbF+U01HFEW0Idr1UzB8kWHiIu4U7hEgl 8XuvGHGz2cUGjl3eLFYVoKWSFYjHB2tkUi2wJDEYSaRY4ke0RukWzOZpcCglOggxhtX/ glO/HZ/8Nlcp+BCIrxU+UelL5Zz4HMiwy3AdH/zp5o6FvPVXucppq/2Bal0wWJ4mpzB4 KX9jFeanGgWigzPoD5QbMTKLGWPoXSzCMAJZOVbxC7GcwPNGsl+WDquT5x20c0dNgQwU mBNA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo09j0cKG/tPXxlOLq3v+e7Ezv9nFB2EjYbBg7arvaTSqIffiJPV R2JInfaQyP4S7AO6/BUwA786du8Y+oPd6vLIxWeqIw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7UNjs+3l0n+qaC+HlXplSczy0gIkobAtWXHnhLFYpiKk8f9U71UA6UV+Ku2jx/8dIqr0u0TatHjt7qxcWg4Fs= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:a70f:0:b0:684:d596:b7e7 with SMTP id b15-20020a5ea70f000000b00684d596b7e7mr6714102iod.84.1661097423278; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 08:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 649336022844 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Sun, 21 Aug 2022 17:57:02 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Superhuman Desktop (2022-08-19T22:05:49Z) X-Superhuman-ID: l73ii63q.a2774910-8ab8-4178-88af-e107ed032f76 References: <20220810210643.1A9504C29D@rfcpa.amsl.com> <20220810212520.ateioe73xzawcldf@benm-laptop> From: Warren Kumari X-Superhuman-Draft-ID: draft00eb1ac285fd8857 In-Reply-To: <20220810212520.ateioe73xzawcldf@benm-laptop> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 17:57:02 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ben Maddison Cc: RFC Errata System , sidr@ietf.org, sidrops@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, andrew-ietf@liquid.tech, jgs@juniper.net, david@mandelberg.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da2de005e6c2617c" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [sidr] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8416 (7080) X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2022 15:57:08 -0000 --000000000000da2de005e6c2617c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Dear SIDROPS, at al, I believe that this Errata is correct, and I intends to mark it Verified unless I hear a clear objection by this Friday (August 26th). W On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:25 PM, Ben Maddison < benm=40workonline.africa@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > Adding sidrops@ > > On 08/10, RFC Errata System wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8416, > "Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI > (SLURM)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7080 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Ben Maddison > > Section: 3.4.2 > > Original Text > ------------- > The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" member, as an > array of zero or more objects. Each object MUST contain one each of all of > the following members: > > o An "asn" member, whose value is a number. > > o An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=' > (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Subject Key Identifier as > described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is the value of the ASN.1 > OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or length fields.) > > o A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without > trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent to the > subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public key, as > described in [RFC8208]. This is the full ASN.1 DER encoding of the > subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and length values of the > subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE. > > Corrected Text > -------------- > The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" member, as an > array of zero or more objects. Each object MUST contain one each of all of > the following members: > > o An "asn" member, whose value is a number. > > o An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=' > (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Subject Key Identifier as > described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is the value of the ASN.1 > OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or length fields.) > > o A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without > trailing '=' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent to the > subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public key, as > described in [RFC8208]. This is the full ASN.1 DER encoding of the > subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and length values of the > subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE. > > In addition, each object MAY contain one optional "comment" member, whose > value is a string. > > Notes > ----- > The "comment" member is allowed to appear in every other structure defined > by the document, and was clearly intended to be allowed here too, since it > appears in the examples presented in sections 3.4.2 and 3.5 > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use > "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a > decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status > and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8416 (draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI > (SLURM) Publication Date : August 2018 > Author(s) : D. Ma, D. Mandelberg, T. Bruijnzeels Category : PROPOSED > STANDARD > Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > --000000000000da2de005e6c2617c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dear SIDROPS, at al,

I believe that this Errata is correct, and I intends to mark it Verif= ied unless I hear a clear objection by this Friday<= /span>=C2=A0(August 26th).

W



On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 5:25 PM, Ben Maddison <benm=3D40workonline.africa@dmarc.ietf.org> wrot= e:

Adding sidrops@

On 08/10, RFC Errata System wrote:

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8416,
"Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management with the RPKI (S= LURM)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7080

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Ben Maddison <benm@workonline.africa>

Section: 3.4.2

Original Text
-------------
The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" membe= r, as an array of zero or more objects. Each object MUST contain one each of all of the following members:

o An "asn" member, whose value is a number.

o An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=3D' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Su= bject Key Identifier as described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is the value of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or length fields.)

o A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=3D' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent t= o the subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public key, as described in [RFC8208]. This is the full ASN.1 DER encoding of the subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and length values of the subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE.

Corrected Text
--------------
The above is expressed as a value of the "bgpsecAssertions" membe= r, as an array of zero or more objects. Each object MUST contain one each of all of the following members:

o An "asn" member, whose value is a number.

o An "SKI" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=3D' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the certificate's Su= bject Key Identifier as described in Section 4.8.2 of [RFC6487] (This is the value of the ASN.1 OCTET STRING without the ASN.1 tag or length fields.)

o A "routerPublicKey" member, whose value is the Base64 encoding without trailing '=3D' (Section 5 of [RFC4648]) of the equivalent t= o the subjectPublicKeyInfo value of the router certificate's public key, as described in [RFC8208]. This is the full ASN.1 DER encoding of the subjectPublicKeyInfo, including the ASN.1 tag and length values of the subjectPublicKeyInfo SEQUENCE.

In addition, each object MAY contain one optional "comment" membe= r, whose value is a string.

Notes
-----
The "comment" member is allowed to appear in every other structur= e defined by the document, and was clearly intended to be allowed here too,= since it appears in the examples presented in sections 3.4.2 and 3.5

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, ple= ase use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party =20 can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.=20

--------------------------------------
RFC8416 (draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-08)
--------------------------------------
Title : Simplified Local Internet Number Resource Management = with the RPKI (SLURM) Publication Date : August 2018
Author(s) : D. Ma, D. Mandelberg, T. Bruijnzeels Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area : Routing
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

______________________________________= _________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org= /mailman/listinfo/sidr

<= /div>
--000000000000da2de005e6c2617c--