Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Thu, 02 March 2017 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EC51295F2; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 06:24:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBSG3eZx9XiL; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 06:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.ops-netman.net [192.110.255.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3451295E6; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 06:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E403FD51; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:24:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from donkey.her.corp.google.com.ops-netman.net (unknown [104.132.12.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD404463D359; Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 09:24:08 -0500
Message-ID: <yj9o60jr3gfr.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
In-Reply-To: <6D0E68CD-C5E9-429E-A06D-F652BC05E9A4@fastmail.fm>
References: <148845266459.19507.8615948310870059270.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170302134212.CD9354BA238@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <6D0E68CD-C5E9-429E-A06D-F652BC05E9A4@fastmail.fm>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/d_g6okyGUSK2EFYirVkc8zAFJWA>
Cc: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2017 14:24:13 -0000

At Thu, 2 Mar 2017 14:06:53 +0000,
Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>; wrote:
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> > On 2 Mar 2017, at 13:42, Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>; wrote:
> > 
> > At Thu, 02 Mar 2017 03:04:24 -0800, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> >> 
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> COMMENT:
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> 
> >> The shepherding write up says that the schema was not validated. Why not?
> > 
> > Er, the write-up is incorrect on this point.  The schema passes
> > validation with trang and xmllint.
> > 
> > I'm not the lead author on this I-D, so this isn't one of my
> > automated-schema-validation-before-running-xml2rfc hacks, but I just
> > extracted the current schema from the -07 text and ran it through
> > trang and xmllint by hand, no problems reported.
> 
> Good to know! The write-up should be corrected on this point.

sorry, fixed.