Re: [sidr] once more with feeling! WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Tue, 27 June 2017 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ADF12955F; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 04:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5jc-JsYTsfpg; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 04:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mahimahi.ripe.net (mahimahi.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1372]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C521126B6E; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 04:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by mahimahi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1dPoHw-0002ti-KX; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:04:09 +0200
Received: from sslvpn.ripe.net ([193.0.20.230] helo=vpn-35.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1dPoHw-0003UY-D2; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:04:08 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <9ACE1099-C5F3-48A3-BE97-649BDA8123BC@zdns.cn>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 13:04:07 +0200
Cc: Mehmet Adalier <madalier@antarateknik.com>, sidr <sidr@ietf.org>, sidr chairs <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <184B0473-C763-495C-92F2-8C93B303E4B5@ripe.net>
References: <801A5228-4DF6-4882-A2A9-77B9BAD58871@tislabs.com> <FE73D619-1368-4A22-8FB1-D310F277D731@ripe.net> <CAL9jLaYv-RZz8rzDy9XpjAsuVV4tFtxO33-0OjLQo2J00R60GA@mail.gmail.com> <87ACB275-5A80-427B-A6D6-D888CC72E03C@tislabs.com> <5D93CE9B-B802-4014-A3B8-F8B3A2F42456@antarateknik.com> <9ACE1099-C5F3-48A3-BE97-649BDA8123BC@zdns.cn>
To: Declan Ma <madi@zdns.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: -------
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -7.5 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -7.5 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a0719c3295e58993c5384debde18958d38759
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/eBGhCTiDqEE4Pgbk-SN17_BerdI>
Subject: Re: [sidr] once more with feeling! WGLC for draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-04
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:04:14 -0000

> On 27 Jun 2017, at 06:19, Declan Ma <madi@zdns.cn> wrote:
> 
>> 2)  Regarding keys, “only in combination with an asserted ASN for that key,” not on the key alone
> 
> 
> I think it’s reasonable to make it obliged to do filtering on the SKI in combination with an asserted ASN. 
> 
> We authors will be figuring out how to get this done after WGLC.

Or.. should we only allow filtering on asserted ASN? Is there a good use case for saying: “I know *this* key is bad for *this* ASN, but I am willing to accept assertions by this same ASN for other keys?”

I kind of suspect that if you don’t trust one of the assertions made by the ASN (for whatever reason), you probably don’t want to trust any of their assertions.

Tim