Return-Path: X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5925921F858A for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:26:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.607 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.867, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bWMuQVKN9Wv6 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:26:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from vimes.kumari.net (vimes.kumari.net [198.186.192.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D921221F8589 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:26:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (unknown [64.13.52.115]) by vimes.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B23CC1B40680; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:26:17 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Warren Kumari In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60756D3@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 17:26:22 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <041CAC39-1FAE-465F-847B-C8E171CF14EE@kumari.net> References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60756D3@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> To: "Murphy, Sandra" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption call for draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 22:26:20 -0000 On Jan 20, 2012, at 7:19 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote: > The working group has been requested to adopt = draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl-01.txt as a working group draft. >=20 > The draft is available at = http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-impl. >=20 > Please respond to the list to say whether you accept this draft as a = working group draft and are willing to work on it. Remember that you do = not need to accept all content in a draft to adopt, as draft editors are = required to reflect the consensus of the working group. Support adoption. I think that this is a *really* useful document as it provides evidence = of the "running code" bit of rough consensus and running code. Knowing what / how far along the various implementations are is useful = as it provides insight into what parts of the protocols / documentation = are well developed and which need more work. Also, the fact that the = vendors are supporting it this much means this will actually be = deployable, and so (to my mind) makes all the time and effort = worthwhile=85 Comments: It is unclear (to me) what exactly was mean by "YES" vs "UNIT TEST" vs = "SYS TEST" -- I could make some guesses, but a definition would be nice. W >=20 > This call will end 3 Feb 2012. >=20 > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >=20 -- Don't be impressed with unintelligible stuff said condescendingly. -- Radia Perlman.