Re: [sidr] request for agenda items for interim meeting 6 Jun

[Randy Bush <[e-mail]>]

>>>>> Can you expound more what you mean by "aliasing" above?  Do you
>>>>> mean local-as, etc.
>>>> yep
>>> That's strange.  Why doesn't the following comment to the list back
>>> in March of this year count as "no comments on list to ...
>>> aliasing"?
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg04093.html
>> it counted so much we spent a good bit of time on it in the april
>> meeting.  we, possibly foolishly, thought we had local convergence.
> For those of us who did not attend the April interim meeting, can you
> point to where the list was asked if they agreed with the "local
> convergence"?

i thought i just did that :)

but, to be fair, i find the minutes lacking, to be kind.  and this is
really the chairs' job.  and i am nose deep in tex with a journal paper
drealine tomorrow.

randy