[sidr] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> Wed, 28 March 2018 03:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ibagdona@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B617120724; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 20:49:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-slurm@ietf.org, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sidr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.76.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152220897556.29881.11439165736430017715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 20:49:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/egt8fD41SsHXonh7mjfg8_QOPbk>
Subject: [sidr] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 03:49:36 -0000
Ignas Bagdonas has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-slurm-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-slurm/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few comments: 1. Document uses all capital form of AND for filters containing both prefixes and ASNs, and filters containing ASNs and SKIs. That is not part of RFC2119 language. 2. s/Route Origination Authorization/Route Origin Authorization 3. If a local assertion is added without a matching filter, does it take priority over existing assertion? 4. The term 'putative TA' has been flagged a couple of times in various reviews as being not known. It does not appear to be formally defined, RFC7730 seems to be the closest source - while it is not formally defined there either.
- [sidr] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf… Ignas Bagdonas
- Re: [sidr] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-… Tim Bruijnzeels