Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

["Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Chris,

With regards to "draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement², the question for
the WG acceptance should go back to the authors on their willingness to
take WG feedback.

If the aim is to work with the WG, I think the document describes a
current problem with inter-RIR address transfers and one (but maybe not
the one the WG would finally document) solution.

If the aim is for the RIRs to inform the rest of the world of a decision
they have taken, this should be an individual draft submission into the
Independent Submission Editor and not a SIDR WG item.

Regards,
Roque


On 06/09/16 18:06, "sidr on behalf of Chris Morrow" <[e-mail]
on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

>At Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:06:25 -0700,
>joel jaeggli <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> [1 Re: Current document status && directionz <multipart/mixed (7bit)>]
>> [1.1  <text/plain; windows-1252 (quoted-printable)>]
>> On 9/2/16 1:56 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
>> > 
>> > Howdy SIDR peeps,
>> > (+bonus ops ad)
>> > 
>> > Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two
>> > things:
>> > 
>> >   1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then
>> >   publication
>> > 
>> >   2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved
>> >   along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that)
>> > 
>> > With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue:
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis
>> > 
>> > and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they
>> > roughly break down like:
>> > 
>> > Documents which should move to the ops group:
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried
>>about this
>> >   draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying
>> 
>> I think we good good feeback on the draft of a charter, I will start
>> work on taking this to the IESG, but as some point soon the time will
>> come to ask for community review of that proposal.
>> 
>
>I also forgot to mention the all-res draft:
>  draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement
>
>is waiting for some AD comments to complete (with chairs I mean) to set
>location/direction.
>
>_______________________________________________
>sidr mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr