Re: [sidr] remote participation experience today

"Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com> Thu, 29 March 2012 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rogaglia@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8F221F88AF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.639, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-WcL17H4r5C for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:51:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22AF21F87B1 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rogaglia@cisco.com; l=7682; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333021868; x=1334231468; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=uWexYxeRmAom7Pu4edgk7l/QLA4Xmll7ZgBLQjwIMqY=; b=OWG8+tijidAQlVlhFJQybwa9sYKuabyN6kgNcwjhxSu8LhSse5hZN0ao wSow14xCM9ESIVwVQPkgI2C9XJ5BtVC6TtF432hzD5SHms6TJctGmqq70 wx7OacizWwjHYBJ5jYqyx14/8x2n6CL1rxVXJGA2l+fgMHXAJ6yIhTCod 4=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4389
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAPBLdE+rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABEuQ+BB4IJAQEBAwEBAQEPAVsLBQsCAQhGAiULJQIEDgUOFIdjBAELm2efHQSQPGMEjmiBIoVXjkWBaIJn
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.73,667,1325462400"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="35075910"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Mar 2012 11:51:08 +0000
Received: from xht-rcd-x02-p.cisco.com (xht-rcd-x02-p.cisco.com [173.37.178.213]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2TBp8tU023335; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:51:08 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com ([169.254.3.120]) by xht-rcd-x02-p.cisco.com ([173.37.178.213]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:51:08 -0700
From: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] remote participation experience today
Thread-Index: AQHNDaI1ummgnXfOvUeFpNJD54OHdw==
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:51:07 +0000
Message-ID: <B91D0BD5-400B-498B-98E2-CAC01D512295@cisco.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F6CB4F9@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F6CB4F9@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.178.200]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.4211-6.800.1017-18804.006
x-tm-as-result: No--34.455000-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-184-379864185"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] remote participation experience today
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:51:10 -0000

Sandra,

I attend the meeting remotely on both Monday and Wednesday. I did not feel the need for Webex as the audio streaming + jabber worked just fine. 

My only comment is to re-emphasize what was mentioned by Wes on the jabber room, please request including page numbers on presentation decks to facilitate the remote experience.

Roque.


On Mar 28, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> The webex session on Monday failed completely, due to laptop wireless incapability to maintain a connection (20-50-80-100% packet loss).
> 
> The webex session on Wednesday (this morning) seemed to work (alternate networking arranged).
> 
> But being the presentation laptop for webex, I was unable to see who (if any) the participants were.
> 
> If you joined the webex session today, PLEASE do comment on the list of what you found worked or did not work for that experience.  (Was your view of slides keeping up?  were you listenting to webex telecon or to ietf audio stream?  could you follow the discussion amongst those in the room?  audio quality?  etc.)
> 
> It would help in figuring out the future virtual meetings.
> 
> --Sandy
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr