Re: [sidr] remote participation experience today

"Sonalker, Anuja" <> Wed, 28 March 2012 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E3121E812F for <>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYJEo+-AkELy for <>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9502B21E8177 for <>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2SEgfWf026207 for <>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:42:41 -0500
Received: from ([]) by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2SEgeWk013017 for <>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:42:41 -0500
Received: from ([2002:9db9:506b::9db9:506b]) by ([2002:9db9:506b::9db9:506b]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:42:40 -0400
From: "Sonalker, Anuja" <>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: remote participation experience today
Thread-Index: Ac0M5//f0srobMRMSzy2GLfZeuNaQQABeoGg
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:42:39 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] remote participation experience today
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:44:38 -0000

Hi Sandy, All

I attended the Webex session this morning (Wednesday) and attempted the one on Monday.

Here is my experience:

- Webex session was quick to launch and start today unlike Monday.

- I used the IETF audio stream along with the Webex visual just to get an idea of real-time lag. (And as a backup in case Webex failed today.) Audio was behind with respect to slides by maybe 10-15 seconds. 

- The slides kept up very well and in sync with the jabber room logs. 

- Audience voices were very clear (I know that's not a Webex thing in my case) and discussion around the room was easy to follow. Plus Jabber logs today were excellent. Together it made for very easy comprehension.

Eyes + Ears + Text  All information streams together worked great to give a great experience.

- My location: Columbia, Maryland, USA (~ Washington DC.)


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:42 AM
Subject: [sidr] remote participation experience today

The webex session on Monday failed completely, due to laptop wireless incapability to maintain a connection (20-50-80-100% packet loss).

The webex session on Wednesday (this morning) seemed to work (alternate networking arranged).

But being the presentation laptop for webex, I was unable to see who (if any) the participants were.

If you joined the webex session today, PLEASE do comment on the list of what you found worked or did not work for that experience.  (Was your view of slides keeping up?  were you listenting to webex telecon or to ietf audio stream?  could you follow the discussion amongst those in the room?  audio quality?  etc.)

It would help in figuring out the future virtual meetings.

sidr mailing list