IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] additional interim meetings

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Mon, 26 March 2012 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250FC21F8569 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:16:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.013, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j6MHmUR3isSo for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4E121F8562 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 23:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2Q6GKJn079636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:16:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4F7009B3.5030201@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:16:19 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F6C91C2@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com> <BCF0371A-098A-4A86-A51E-93B4043EF3F7@ripe.net> <4F6C741F.3020309@gmail.com> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173D275A3E@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173D275A3E@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] additional interim meetings
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 06:16:56 -0000

On 23/03/2012 16:08, George, Wes wrote:

> [WEG] One point to make here... I think you're overselling the difficulty of
> requesting and receiving additional slots when they are all requested at the
> same time, rather than retroactively as was done this time. Yes by strict
> math you're correct, but rarely do all of the WGs meet. 

For Paris, the agenda was overloaded and all WG chairs were specifically asked
to review the agenda for their WG, check if the discussions they had planned for
the meeting needed face-2-face discussion and return the slot if not.

Henk

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
                                          http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email