IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard

David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org> Fri, 31 July 2015 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <david@mandelberg.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9831B2DFB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qjrrUIMR40_A for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm13-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm13-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DDE11B2DAA for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 17:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1438301130; bh=l7R+BHw5TuJOIwGwVnkYuHZkB9r67vi03GaLN6uNG+E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=juOIbmJggrAV3HQz/DcJURo7xxcQjc7XLwHt3dJYFabrJ2UXjwfsrA8Vbc7WB+TDAoqhPrfwx553IdfRhQ8PdMDnkIEvt5vNumY4JUDPmMfXA5NC9MM+luejVevFAAgjXCPFGyvcGAc55pek/KKaPRNBlhzAHCuVH8sm7XryE9ApE9nW86WimtvFnha72pD26dPZ0cs4gRSVzgv3uCZyrE2JcM4bjuCxRQMEJ+OSaJauvOUnXz4rHXBF789XaEBdu8SyLpzB0d9klOEROB+nbHAyntCq2H4zC9R1E33ThJRhg+giBReELx6vCk/vu2+5g8QSV0t3t7p0WN3U1FgqXw==
Received: from [216.39.60.176] by nm13.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2015 00:05:30 -0000
Received: from [98.138.226.241] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2015 00:05:30 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp112.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Jul 2015 00:05:30 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 776784.79972.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: cfFKHDQVM1l7Espxvi8bExaa7lytQMXs925vqlQVXzNMO.R 5WL2WCTSb6MemRndyRBryLx6Vft7sntSQQQnMXqsxnGpTV4rEkzu_IjTxNAz nn8w4IoNR5g72HpyMCx_S4EuU4ndgHpOnLkN86xEC3jdQzVH9sPPxCGe_6ls kDo3cvv5CpTvnHbxSkYzFNB6EhrhngHJbBmuiaUXm4m7GAKD8IwNBzOCz4tm 5Obh9a.KWZQDyoLtmNS.KFZ1kBzZz5WeNXw0nrhrreuMh5maCrij0ko8NT4H .9udHTh0x7zcGOGJa3V_VOS.FCUlS5hdPxUe6sIWrwB8X6Hd2NZduQCNvmBv FzV7OVLhSIs2udCDA1K7u5K7Tvjef40jnHhAk474lt4JdPrWsYD1ZcZQ9zm. Sdn14NP5c1Dnigyuj3WF4gwYGcIsrrxodgUVv36Hv69bZsH4PjpxwiqzN2fl 9LJC9zQDvtxHxizXJHdtuxYkQTfnukfyccBYNx2NT6Hab_ff4m.RUxnL4BcP vsapug2UJgujUsad9TXlvUJG1XqN5AwK.lpo_Pw--
X-Yahoo-SMTP: 4kJJK.qswBDPuwyc5wW.BPAQqNXdy5j09UNyeAS0pyOQ708-
Received: from secure.mandelberg.org (c-76-24-31-176.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [76.24.31.176]) by uriel.mandelberg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AA011C6066; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:05:29 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:05:29 -0400
From: David Mandelberg <david@mandelberg.org>
To: sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <55B97546.3060200@bbn.com>
References: <20150709134637.7120.70507.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <55A5E727.7020605@bbn.com> <55B97546.3060200@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <6330ac92bedc4de98ff02530d9750918@mail.mandelberg.org>
X-Sender: david@mandelberg.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/gnhfh0UmIn89kccoNJwrccZYPzA>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Last Call: <draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-04.txt> (Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:05:32 -0000

On 2015-07-29 20:52, Richard Hansen wrote:
> I misread the MIME RFC; it requires line breaks every 76 characters, 
> not
> every 75.  So I think 76 is a better choice.

For what it's worth, here are line lengths from an assortment of TALs I 
had lying around.

afrinic.tal: 64
apnic-rpki-root-afrinic-origin.tal: 64
apnic-rpki-root-arin-origin.tal: 64
apnic-rpki-root-iana-origin.tal: 64
apnic-rpki-root-lacnic-origin.tal: 64
apnic-rpki-root-ripe-origin.tal: 64
arin.tal: 80
lacnic.tal: 64
ripe-ncc-root.tal: 55
ripe-pilot.tal: 78

Of these, one production TAL (arin.tal) and one non-production TAL 
(ripe-pilot.tal) are longer than 76. However, TALs are generally only 
used locally, and re-wrapping text is rather easy. So I don't think the 
existing TALs should have too large of an impact on whatever decision we 
make.

-- 
David Eric Mandelberg / dseomn
http://david.mandelberg.org/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email