Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops

Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org> Fri, 28 October 2011 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jayb@zoe.braeburn.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7300111E80A3 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yuXibVRotewB for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail119.messagelabs.com (mail119.messagelabs.com [216.82.241.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D4711E809F for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Env-Sender: jayb@zoe.braeburn.org
X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-119.messagelabs.com!1319835465!33500288!1
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145]
X-StarScan-Version: 6.3.6; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 7832 invoked from network); 28 Oct 2011 20:57:45 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-2.tower-119.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 28 Oct 2011 20:57:45 -0000
Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9SKwCqv017185 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:58:12 -0400
Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9SKw9DM017136 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:58:10 -0400
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9SKvful003900 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:57:41 -0400
Received: from oz.mt.att.com (oz.mt.att.com [135.16.165.23]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9SKvYv4003522 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:57:34 -0400
Received: by oz.mt.att.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id DAE7C2BF2C; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:57:33 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.1 (via feedmail 8 I); VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <20139.5946.308162.267635@oz.mt.att.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:57:30 -0400
From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabcaLnBbZXbNf7Lbv+ppm-h9yO+wBHunG4s1=emOyM6=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL9jLaaOm_=W85r3P990A6DtROTcQwSJ-KBRzAi9ugw1Bo1_cQ@mail.gmail.com> <E4B4DE52-BBB3-4FA0-A75A-B51824BA83E7@lacnic.net> <m2hb3a7uqp.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2fwiu7uji.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLabcaLnBbZXbNf7Lbv+ppm-h9yO+wBHunG4s1=emOyM6=w@mail.gmail.com>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: DDDB 542E D988 94D0 82D3 D198 7DED 6648 2308 D3C0
Sender: jayb@zoe.braeburn.org
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 20:57:48 -0000

Hi,

I have read, and I support moving this forward.

	     			Jay B.

Christopher Morrow writes:
 > Two folks seem to have given this a read-through, is that all the
 > interest that exists? is documenting how originators of routes ought
 > to think/use/abuse RPKI not something we should do here?
 > 
 > please chime in if you've given this a read and are onboard with it
 > moving forward.
 > 
 > -chris
 > 
 > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 12:22 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
 > >>> What's the rationale of this change from version 10 to 11?
 > >> after much discussion with ops and security folk, it is the purpose of
 > >> the whole exercise.  you wanna stop 7007?
 > >
 > > fwiw, it has swung back and forth a few times
 > >
 > > randy
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > sidr mailing list
 > > sidr@ietf.org
 > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
 > >
 > _______________________________________________
 > sidr mailing list
 > sidr@ietf.org
 > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr