IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Mon, 13 March 2017 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DB5129687; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:16:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SatFj9lioNlK; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.ops-netman.net [192.110.255.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33465129642; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF5F3FE97; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:15:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from donkey.her.corp.google.com.ops-netman.net (unknown [104.132.12.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C8D45C95879; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:15:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 10:15:58 -0400
Message-ID: <yj9o1su11cv5.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net>
In-Reply-To: <20170313124711.9BED75DCCA4@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
References: <5821A5CF-EFF8-4CE3-9AA4-CFDB9C903D63@cisco.com> <20170311222527.324125ACF21@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <yj9ok27upcws.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <6359B4B1-478D-4017-B259-7B60BA55FF39@zdns.cn> <20170313124711.9BED75DCCA4@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/hFegP9VDPUTXgihIqpRXf7Q3NYs>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] AD Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-07
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:16:03 -0000

At Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:47:11 -0400,
Rob Austein <sra@hactrn.net> wrote:
> 
> At Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:16:59 +0800, Declan Ma wrote:
> ...
> > It seems to me that the only concern on OID is about using OPENSSL
> > to get resource sets for further validation process. If the WG has
> > decided to deprecate the original by using the Validation
> > Reconsidered, why bother to bring a new OID ? 
> 
> Because library code which thinks it understands RFC 3779 has been
> shipping for a decade now, and the WG has no magic wand which can make
> that library code go away.  It is very poor form to retroactively
> change the semantics of something that has already shipped, at least
> when there is an easy way to avoid the problem, as there is here.

new oid's seemed reasonable to me... as a chemical engineer playing
security engineer on network things.

-chris

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email