Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 20 July 2016 14:22 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B215F12D808 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:22:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXV00lIbzovJ for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70E112D802 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 07:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:40921 helo=COMSEC.fios-router.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1bPsOF-00082S-LL for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:22:23 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
References: <20160719111830.12A97412B25E@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Message-ID: <1c97d2b8-485d-b208-8cf9-43fdcf27646a@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:22:24 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160719111830.12A97412B25E@minas-ithil.hactrn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/hf9fERvxTKVuzbFSpuEDb0AxGm4>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extension OIDs
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:22:35 -0000
Rob, I agree with your suggestion to create a new OID for this purpose. This can be noted in the document under discussion. I also agree with Russ's comment that the cert policy needs to be updated to reflect the fact that use either OID is OK (if we stick with one policy OID). Steve
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… t.petch
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Sean Turner
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… t.petch
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Sean Turner
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Russ Housley
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 ex… Russ Housley
- [sidr] Validation reconsidered and X.509v3 extens… Rob Austein