Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Fri, 28 October 2016 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8781293F9 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:54:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m9kzzJjNeY-k for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77505129A8B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n6so135714qtd.1 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=y2/sk4YzXNFDcKhMao+RR6b3l/R1XDbEO1zcrAj8HLo=; b=MiBpVWRI6J8Ft5b193YhFIkByfgCWeWdOBaA0mV2eOOVSGZPzyFWgVKw27LHNpOl4F JTXjvTa1GrkcjK0cujES98EhVrRbcnLIFWpketkGbtriXNvgkwCEEOGFGrFuXGk6HHJG /xe9Hghm8iDj6tj+QgPTQXFXtckSU10aKJ+LY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=y2/sk4YzXNFDcKhMao+RR6b3l/R1XDbEO1zcrAj8HLo=; b=cdMHWsken1AeL9idX9hNG+ID+fZ7aO10FeyDDCxgxut7Ra9a/F/dUniiU9O+9ac7UF RD04/G+Y68wiu7xUGdI1wTo0D6TpDiTDobUlemg6VqT2RPxA2UbTjaw2kXsxm9F6wc97 8nkf00gOP8lPFC66XZ31iLNP625vLSSqkbAZNsVVg3TVq2PPmXH5sgNBaDWwNp3jSk63 eJFff8wz00/78ztLc/gQYbUcdBwm13+9DXMHsHAnxWFjtQFwXhcd4sisdul0HXiqX6/w ITPT2KpHV8E3ku833cHAlO8yBzzfQL3j1GcA96hva4ieF2P2sPZWVm+25qnmqUGpKAVZ 1FJw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvezuhyI7uiHLDtQUhqXZVfK0nCUvXTb0W5x4AjAOUibsXCj42SiSMjBKaqGEjBLpg==
X-Received: by 10.237.49.198 with SMTP id 64mr11190572qth.113.1477659251567; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.112] ([96.231.230.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm6160001qkc.14.2016.10.28.05.54.09 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:54:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <77AED014-31CB-4C2D-BD68-663C62C715C3@sn3rd.com>
References: <yj9otwcjnfkl.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <DM2PR09MB0446D5E5310327B1766D6D4384AB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/jyRQRXl2U1-JNjm5CrLvFonWu0k>
Cc: "sidr-ads@ietf.org" <sidr-ads@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:54:15 -0000

Can do.  But I probably won’t get to it until this weekend.

spt

> On Oct 26, 2016, at 11:32, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all,
> 
> Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I would like to see this go through as you might expect from an author...
> 
> That said, can someone with good ASN.1-fu please have look at the changes w.r.t. ASN.1 structure and OIDs? I tried to include all your comments properly - but I would feel safer if one of you could confirm.
> 
> Thanks
> Tim
> 
> 
>> On 26 Oct 2016, at 05:13, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> I read the draft once again. I support publication.
>> 
>> Found a minor typo in the last paragraph on p.15 (can be dealt with during RFC editor review process):
>> s/the loss of on IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/the loss of one IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/
>> 
>> Sriram
>> 
>> ________________________________________
>> From: sidr <sidr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:08 AM
>> To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-chairs@ietf.org; sidr-ads@ietf.org
>> Subject: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends      10/25/2016
>> 
>> Howdy WG folks!
>> The authors of:
>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
>> 
>> believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the
>> request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if
>> appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication.
>> 
>> The abstract for this draft is:
>> "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation
>>  procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational
>>  fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while
>>  retaining essential security features."
>> 
>> Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please,
>> this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016.
>> 
>> thanks for reading/replying/thinking!
>> -chris
>> co-chair-persona
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>