Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-00

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C63E126579 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XpdqbRRQCi1R for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B41921200A0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20C2300A1E for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:44:55 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id qJETGOhxWUiJ for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:44:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dhcp-9a0d.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9a0d.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.154.13]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5678E3005DF; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:44:54 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5E79B7-4E84-4803-A9EC-4EC2D5719C77@ripe.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 13:44:56 -0400
Cc: IETF SIDR <sidr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D62DAF4C-52A8-4C35-9919-9E4ED9E6C458@vigilsec.com>
References: <B3A27099-810E-46D5-A2E9-49C01F4389A2@vigilsec.com> <5A5E79B7-4E84-4803-A9EC-4EC2D5719C77@ripe.net>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/k8SV4Eu9WxFFglkbIu2vMCvglA4>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidrops-signed-tal-00
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:44:59 -0000

Tim:

I think that a statement in Section 3 that it uses CMS SignedData [RFC5652] would make this very clear.

Russ


> On Mar 22, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Russ,
> 
> Yes, this is a CMS object. Section 3 describes this. It’s an extension of RPKI Signed Object - which is CMS.- and specifies the relevant content type (3.1) and eContent (3.2).
> 
> Tim
> 
>> On 22 Mar 2018, at 17:02, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Is the intent to use CMS to sign the trust anchor list?  Since ROAs are signed with CMS, I was expecting these signatures to follow the same convention.  However, there is no reference to CMS in the draft.
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> 
>